On 28-Mar-18 12:26 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
28/03/2018 12:42, Burakov, Anatoly:
On 28-Mar-18 10:53 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
28/03/2018 11:21, Burakov, Anatoly:
I'm not against trying to improve the core design. I'm just saying that,
had this kind of feedback been provided just a bit earlie
28/03/2018 12:42, Burakov, Anatoly:
> On 28-Mar-18 10:53 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 28/03/2018 11:21, Burakov, Anatoly:
> >> so i don't think
> >> it's such a big deal to have two IPC threads instead of one. I'm open to
> >> suggestions on how to make this work without a second thread, but i
>
On 28-Mar-18 10:53 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
28/03/2018 11:21, Burakov, Anatoly:
On 28-Mar-18 9:55 AM, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
On 3/28/2018 4:22 PM, Van Haaren, Harry wrote:
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
28/03/2018 04:08, Tan, Jianfeng:
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...
28/03/2018 11:21, Burakov, Anatoly:
> On 28-Mar-18 9:55 AM, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
> > On 3/28/2018 4:22 PM, Van Haaren, Harry wrote:
> >> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> >>> 28/03/2018 04:08, Tan, Jianfeng:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> > 27/03/
, Harry
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] eal: add asynchronous request
API to
DPDK IPC
28/03/2018 04:08, Tan, Jianfeng:
Hi Thomas ,
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
27/03/2018 15:59, Anatoly Burakov:
Under the hood, we create a separate thread to deal with replies to
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 09:29:35AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 28/03/2018 04:08, Tan, Jianfeng:
> > Hi Thomas ,
> >
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> > > 27/03/2018 15:59, Anatoly Burakov:
> > > > Under the hood, we create a separate thread to deal with replies to
> > >
> -Original Message-
> From: Tan, Jianfeng
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 9:55 AM
> To: Van Haaren, Harry ; Thomas Monjalon
>
> Cc: Burakov, Anatoly ; dev@dpdk.org; Ananyev,
> Konstantin
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] eal: add asynchronous request A
] eal: add asynchronous request API to
DPDK IPC
28/03/2018 04:08, Tan, Jianfeng:
Hi Thomas ,
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
27/03/2018 15:59, Anatoly Burakov:
Under the hood, we create a separate thread to deal with replies to
asynchronous requests, that will just wait to be
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 8:30 AM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: Burakov, Anatoly ; dev@dpdk.org; Ananyev,
> Konstantin ; Van Haaren, Harry
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] eal: add asynchronous request API
28/03/2018 04:08, Tan, Jianfeng:
> Hi Thomas ,
>
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> > 27/03/2018 15:59, Anatoly Burakov:
> > > Under the hood, we create a separate thread to deal with replies to
> > > asynchronous requests, that will just wait to be notified by the
> > > main t
Hi Thomas ,
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 12:34 AM
> To: Burakov, Anatoly
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Tan, Jianfeng; Ananyev, Konstantin; Van Haaren, Harry
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] eal
27/03/2018 15:59, Anatoly Burakov:
> Under the hood, we create a separate thread to deal with replies to
> asynchronous requests, that will just wait to be notified by the
> main thread, or woken up on a timer.
I really don't like that a library is creating a thread.
We don't even know where the t
This API is similar to the blocking API that is already present,
but reply will be received in a separate callback by the caller
(callback specified at the time of request, rather than registering
for it in advance).
Under the hood, we create a separate thread to deal with replies to
asynchronous
13 matches
Mail list logo
