On 11/2/2020 11:08 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 11/2/2020 9:11 AM, Jiawen Wu wrote:
On Sunday, November 1, 2020 6:26 PM, David Marchand wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 10:15 AM Thomas Monjalon
wrote:
The new txgbe driver in the next-net is also using ‘udata64’, that
also needs to be updated. cc'e
On 11/2/2020 9:11 AM, Jiawen Wu wrote:
On Sunday, November 1, 2020 6:26 PM, David Marchand wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 10:15 AM Thomas Monjalon
wrote:
The new txgbe driver in the next-net is also using ‘udata64’, that
also needs to be updated. cc'ed txgbe maintainer.
That's a pity it did n
On Sunday, November 1, 2020 6:26 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 10:15 AM Thomas Monjalon
> wrote:
> > > The new txgbe driver in the next-net is also using ‘udata64’, that
> > > also needs to be updated. cc'ed txgbe maintainer.
> >
> > That's a pity it did not take into account
On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 10:15 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > The new txgbe driver in the next-net is also using ‘udata64’, that also
> > needs to
> > be updated. cc'ed txgbe maintainer.
>
> That's a pity it did not take into account the deprecation notice.
> What kind of hack is it used for?
> Can
01/11/2020 00:36, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 10/31/2020 3:07 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 30/10/2020 18:44, Thomas Monjalon:
> >> The mbuf field userdata (aliased as udata64)
> >> was announced to be removed for two reasons:
> >>- applications, libraries and drivers used the same field
> >> for
On 10/31/2020 3:07 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
30/10/2020 18:44, Thomas Monjalon:
The mbuf field userdata (aliased as udata64)
was announced to be removed for two reasons:
- applications, libraries and drivers used the same field
for different purposes, with a risk of usage conflict.
-
30/10/2020 18:44, Thomas Monjalon:
> The mbuf field userdata (aliased as udata64)
> was announced to be removed for two reasons:
> - applications, libraries and drivers used the same field
> for different purposes, with a risk of usage conflict.
> - this field always used 8 bytes even if un
The mbuf field userdata (aliased as udata64)
was announced to be removed for two reasons:
- applications, libraries and drivers used the same field
for different purposes, with a risk of usage conflict.
- this field always used 8 bytes even if unneeded
Some dynamic fields are created when
8 matches
Mail list logo
