Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/8] Introducing EAL Bus-Device-Driver Model

2017-01-16 Thread Shreyansh Jain
On Monday 16 January 2017 11:57 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 21:08:19 +0530 Shreyansh Jain wrote: Link to v5: [15] :: Introduction :: DPDK has been inherently a PCI inclined framework. Because of this, the design of device tree (or list) within DPDK is also PCI inclined.

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/8] Introducing EAL Bus-Device-Driver Model

2017-01-16 Thread Shreyansh Jain
On Monday 16 January 2017 11:57 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 21:08:19 +0530 Shreyansh Jain wrote: Link to v5: [15] :: Introduction :: DPDK has been inherently a PCI inclined framework. Because of this, the design of device tree (or list) within DPDK is also PCI inclined.

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/8] Introducing EAL Bus-Device-Driver Model

2017-01-16 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 21:08:19 +0530 Shreyansh Jain wrote: > Link to v5: [15] > > :: Introduction :: > > DPDK has been inherently a PCI inclined framework. Because of this, the > design of device tree (or list) within DPDK is also PCI inclined. A > non-PCI device doesn't have a way of being expre

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/8] Introducing EAL Bus-Device-Driver Model

2017-01-16 Thread Shreyansh Jain
Link to v5: [15] :: Introduction :: DPDK has been inherently a PCI inclined framework. Because of this, the design of device tree (or list) within DPDK is also PCI inclined. A non-PCI device doesn't have a way of being expressed without using hooks started from EAL to PMD. (Check 'Version Change