Hi Stephen,
On 3/4/2015 8:52 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 11:38:25 +0100
> David Marchand wrote:
>
>> Ok, so after looking at this patchset, I would say this is the right
>> direction, but still this is too limited.
>> The ethdev part and the vfio eventfds part look accepta
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 11:38:25 +0100
David Marchand wrote:
> Ok, so after looking at this patchset, I would say this is the right
> direction, but still this is too limited.
> The ethdev part and the vfio eventfds part look acceptable to me.
> But thinking about it, I could just reuse a standard e
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 11:38:25 +0100
David Marchand wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Cunming Liang
> wrote:
> v6 changes
> ?- split rte_intr_wait_rx_pkt into two APIs 'wait' and 'set'.
> ?- rewrite rte_intr_rx_wait/rte_intr_rx_set.
> ?- using vector number instead of queue_id as interrup
v6 changes
- split rte_intr_wait_rx_pkt into two APIs 'wait' and 'set'.
- rewrite rte_intr_rx_wait/rte_intr_rx_set.
- using vector number instead of queue_id as interrupt API params.
- patch reorder and split.
v5 changes
- Rebase the patchset onto the HEAD
- Isolate ethdev from EAL for new-a
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Cunming Liang
wrote:
> v6 changes
> - split rte_intr_wait_rx_pkt into two APIs 'wait' and 'set'.
> - rewrite rte_intr_rx_wait/rte_intr_rx_set.
> - using vector number instead of queue_id as interrupt API params.
> - patch reorder and split.
>
>
Ok, so after lo
ead on core1 and
core2 will sleep when there's no packet received.
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Cunming Liang
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 12:56 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/8] Inter
6 matches
Mail list logo