On 2021/5/19 20:37, David Marchand wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:17 PM fengchengwen wrote:
>> We also found compile error with gcc8.3 with arm64_kunpeng930_linux_gcc
>> (-march=-march=armv8.2-a+crypto+sve):
>> In file included from
>> ../dpdk-next-net/lib/eal/common/eal_common_options.
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:17 PM fengchengwen wrote:
> We also found compile error with gcc8.3 with arm64_kunpeng930_linux_gcc
> (-march=-march=armv8.2-a+crypto+sve):
> In file included from
> ../dpdk-next-net/lib/eal/common/eal_common_options.c:38:
> ../dpdk-next-net/lib/eal/arm/include/rte_
On 2021/5/19 17:27, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 5/19/2021 9:08 AM, David Marchand wrote:
>> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 6:28 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>>>
>>> On 5/14/2021 3:12 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
>
> Currently, the SVE code is compiled only when -march supports SVE (e.g. '
On 5/19/2021 9:08 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 6:28 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>>
>> On 5/14/2021 3:12 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
>>>
>>>
Currently, the SVE code is compiled only when -march supports SVE (e.g. '-
march=armv8.2a+sve'), there maybe some proble
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 6:28 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>
> On 5/14/2021 3:12 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Currently, the SVE code is compiled only when -march supports SVE (e.g. '-
> >> march=armv8.2a+sve'), there maybe some problem[1] with this approach.
> >>
> >> The solution:
Thanks a lot, Ferruh & Honnappa.
On 2021/5/19 0:27, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 5/14/2021 3:12 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Currently, the SVE code is compiled only when -march supports SVE (e.g. '-
>>> march=armv8.2a+sve'), there maybe some problem[1] with this approach.
>>>
>>> Th
On 2021/5/19 0:37, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 5/18/2021 5:12 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
>
> On 5/14/2021 10:53 AM, Chengwen Feng wrote:
>> Currently, the SVE code is compiled only when -march supports SVE
>> (e.g. '-march=armv8.2a+sve'), there maybe some problem[1] with
On 5/18/2021 5:12 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
>>>
On 5/14/2021 10:53 AM, Chengwen Feng wrote:
> Currently, the SVE code is compiled only when -march supports SVE
> (e.g. '-march=armv8.2a+sve'), there maybe some problem[1] with this
> approach.
>
> The solution:
>>
On 5/14/2021 3:12 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Currently, the SVE code is compiled only when -march supports SVE (e.g. '-
>> march=armv8.2a+sve'), there maybe some problem[1] with this approach.
>>
>> The solution:
>> a. If the minimum instruction set support SVE then compiles it.
>>
> >
> >>
> >> On 5/14/2021 10:53 AM, Chengwen Feng wrote:
> >>> Currently, the SVE code is compiled only when -march supports SVE
> >>> (e.g. '-march=armv8.2a+sve'), there maybe some problem[1] with this
> >>> approach.
> >>>
> >>> The solution:
> >>> a. If the minimum instruction set support SVE
On 5/18/2021 4:15 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:40:18PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 5/14/2021 10:53 AM, Chengwen Feng wrote:
>>> Currently, the SVE code is compiled only when -march supports SVE
>>> (e.g. '-march=armv8.2a+sve'), there maybe some problem[1] with this
On 5/18/2021 4:48 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
>
>>
>> On 5/14/2021 10:53 AM, Chengwen Feng wrote:
>>> Currently, the SVE code is compiled only when -march supports SVE
>>> (e.g. '-march=armv8.2a+sve'), there maybe some problem[1] with this
>>> approach.
>>>
>>> The solution:
>>> a. If the mini
>
> On 5/14/2021 10:53 AM, Chengwen Feng wrote:
> > Currently, the SVE code is compiled only when -march supports SVE
> > (e.g. '-march=armv8.2a+sve'), there maybe some problem[1] with this
> > approach.
> >
> > The solution:
> > a. If the minimum instruction set support SVE then compiles it.
> >
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:40:18PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 5/14/2021 10:53 AM, Chengwen Feng wrote:
> > Currently, the SVE code is compiled only when -march supports SVE
> > (e.g. '-march=armv8.2a+sve'), there maybe some problem[1] with this
> > approach.
> >
> > The solution:
> > a. If th
On 5/14/2021 10:53 AM, Chengwen Feng wrote:
> Currently, the SVE code is compiled only when -march supports SVE
> (e.g. '-march=armv8.2a+sve'), there maybe some problem[1] with this
> approach.
>
> The solution:
> a. If the minimum instruction set support SVE then compiles it.
> b. Else if the com
On 5/18/2021 1:41 PM, fengchengwen wrote:
> Hi, Thomas, Ferruh
>
> This patch is part of the hns3 SVE compilation solution and can work
> independently. Could you review it ?
>
Hi Chengwen,
This patch has been missed as being part of the config file set. As far as I
understand you want this ch
>
> >
> > Hi, Thomas, Ferruh
> >
> > This patch is part of the hns3 SVE compilation solution and can work
> > independently. Could you review it ?
> I believe this patch is targeted for 20.08 release (as 20.05 is already close
> to
> completion), is my understanding correct?
> If it is targeted f
>
> Hi, Thomas, Ferruh
>
> This patch is part of the hns3 SVE compilation solution and can work
> independently. Could you review it ?
I believe this patch is targeted for 20.08 release (as 20.05 is already close
to completion), is my understanding correct?
If it is targeted for 20.08, it will
Hi, Thomas, Ferruh
This patch is part of the hns3 SVE compilation solution and can work
independently. Could you review it ?
Best regards
On 2021/5/14 22:12, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Currently, the SVE code is compiled only when -march supports SVE (e.g. '-
>> march=armv8.2a+sve'
>
> Currently, the SVE code is compiled only when -march supports SVE (e.g. '-
> march=armv8.2a+sve'), there maybe some problem[1] with this approach.
>
> The solution:
> a. If the minimum instruction set support SVE then compiles it.
> b. Else if the compiler support SVE then compiles it.
> c.
Currently, the SVE code is compiled only when -march supports SVE
(e.g. '-march=armv8.2a+sve'), there maybe some problem[1] with this
approach.
The solution:
a. If the minimum instruction set support SVE then compiles it.
b. Else if the compiler support SVE then compiles it.
c. Otherwise don't com
21 matches
Mail list logo
