8, 2017 2:43 PM
> To: Yigit, Ferruh ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Adrien Mazarguil ; Nélio Laranjeiro
>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] net/mlx5: support upstream rdma-core
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yi...@intel.com]
> -Original Message-
> From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yi...@intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 12:07 PM
> To: Shachar Beiser ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Adrien Mazarguil ; Nélio Laranjeiro
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] net/mlx5: support upstream r
gt;>
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] net/mlx5: support upstream rdma-core
>>
>> On 9/14/2017 2:34 PM, Shachar Beiser wrote:
>>> This removes the dependency on specific Mellanox OFED libraries by
>>> using the upstream rdma-core and linux upstream
Hi Ferruh,
Sunday, September 17, 2017 10:32 AM, Shachar Beiser:
> > On 9/14/2017 2:34 PM, Shachar Beiser wrote:
> > > This removes the dependency on specific Mellanox OFED libraries by
> > > using the upstream rdma-core and linux upstream community code.
> >
> > Would you mind mentioning what is
> -Original Message-
> From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yi...@intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 4:47 PM
> To: Shachar Beiser ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Adrien Mazarguil ; Nélio Laranjeiro
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] net/mlx5: support upstream r
On 9/14/2017 2:34 PM, Shachar Beiser wrote:
> This removes the dependency on specific Mellanox OFED libraries by
> using the upstream rdma-core and linux upstream community code.
Would you mind mentioning what is the difference between "specific
Mellanox OFED libraries" and "upstream rdma-core"? I
This removes the dependency on specific Mellanox OFED libraries by
using the upstream rdma-core and linux upstream community code.
---
I have squashed :
[PATCH v2 3/3] “net/mlx5: fix interrupt enable return”
http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/28380/
into this patch
a. Compile with rdma-core comm
7 matches
Mail list logo
