Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] ip_frag: remove padding length of fragment

2020-12-16 Thread luyicai
...@dpdk.org Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] ip_frag: remove padding length of fragment > Hi Yicai, > > In some situations, we would get several ip fragments, which total > > data length is less than min_ip_len(64) and padding with zeros. > > We simulated intermediate f

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] ip_frag: remove padding length of fragment

2020-12-16 Thread Ananyev, Konstantin
Hi Yicai, > > In some situations, we would get several ip fragments, which total > > data length is less than min_ip_len(64) and padding with zeros. > > We simulated intermediate fragments by modifying the MTU. > > To illustrate the problem, we simplify the packet format and ignore > > the impa

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] ip_frag: remove padding length of fragment

2020-12-14 Thread luyicai
ohongzhi (Russell Lab) > ; wangyunjian ; > sta...@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] ip_frag: remove padding length of fragment > Hi Yicai, > In some situations, we would get several ip fragments, which total > data length is less than min_ip_len(64) and padding with zeros. &

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] ip_frag: remove padding length of fragment

2020-12-14 Thread Ananyev, Konstantin
Hi Yicai, > In some situations, we would get several ip fragments, which total > data length is less than min_ip_len(64) and padding with zeros. > We simulated intermediate fragments by modifying the MTU. > To illustrate the problem, we simplify the packet format and > ignore the impact of the

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] ip_frag: remove padding length of fragment

2020-12-12 Thread Yicai Lu
In some situations, we would get several ip fragments, which total data length is less than min_ip_len(64) and padding with zeros. We simulated intermediate fragments by modifying the MTU. To illustrate the problem, we simplify the packet format and ignore the impact of the packet header.In namespa