2016-07-21 12:01, Mrozowicz, SlawomirX:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> As I understand Sergio suggested to come back to the solution similar to v1.
> Could you comment or better take decision which solution should be applied,
> please.
>
> Best Regards,
> S?awomir
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From:
6 1:29 PM
>To: Thomas Monjalon
>Cc: Mrozowicz, SlawomirX ;
>dev at dpdk.org; david.marchand at 6wind.com
>Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] eal: out-of-bounds write
>
>On 20/06/2016 11:09, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 2016-06-20 10:38, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy:
>>>
On 20/06/2016 11:09, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-06-20 10:38, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy:
>> On 20/06/2016 10:14, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL,
+ "All memory segments exhausted by IVSHMEM. "
>>> There is no evidence that it is related to IVSHMEM.
>>> "
2016-06-20 10:38, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy:
> On 20/06/2016 10:14, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL,
> >> + "All memory segments exhausted by IVSHMEM. "
> > There is no evidence that it is related to IVSHMEM.
> > "Not enough memory segments." would be more appr
2016-06-16 16:52, Slawomir Mrozowicz:
> Overrunning array mcfg->memseg of 256 44-byte elements
> at element index 257 using index j.
> Fixed by add condition with message information.
>
> Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release")
> Coverity ID 13282
Please use this formatting:
Coverity issue:
On 20/06/2016 10:14, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> +RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL,
>> +"All memory segments exhausted by IVSHMEM. "
> There is no evidence that it is related to IVSHMEM.
> "Not enough memory segments." would be more appropriate.
Actually we would hit this issue when
Overrunning array mcfg->memseg of 256 44-byte elements
at element index 257 using index j.
Fixed by add condition with message information.
Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release")
Coverity ID 13282
Signed-off-by: Slawomir Mrozowicz
---
v5:
- update message
v4:
- remove check condition from
7 matches
Mail list logo