Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/5] app/test-pmd: add Port Representor commands

2018-01-09 Thread Remy Horton
On 09/01/2018 22:10, Ferruh Yigit wrote: [..] +Adding a representor for a VF requires specifying the PF in +``Bus_DomBDF`` format alongside the index number of the VF:: + + testpmd> add representor pci_:81:00.0 0 I am for grouping port related commands under "port" command, these are all

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/5] app/test-pmd: add Port Representor commands

2018-01-09 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 1/8/2018 2:37 PM, Remy Horton wrote: > Port Representors provide a logical presentation in DPDK of VF (virtual > function) ports for the purposes of control and monitoring. Each port > representor device represents a single VF and is associated with it's > parent physical function (PF) PMD which

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/5] app/test-pmd: add Port Representor commands

2018-01-08 Thread Remy Horton
Port Representors provide a logical presentation in DPDK of VF (virtual function) ports for the purposes of control and monitoring. Each port representor device represents a single VF and is associated with it's parent physical function (PF) PMD which provides the back-end hooks for the representor