Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 26/27] memif: replace master/slave with server/client

2020-07-17 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 14:01:46 +0100 "Burakov, Anatoly" wrote: > On 01-Jul-20 9:23 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > The names master and slave have no place inside this driver. > > It is really a traditional client server model, so use those names. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > > ---

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 26/27] memif: replace master/slave with server/client

2020-07-17 Thread Burakov, Anatoly
On 01-Jul-20 9:23 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: The names master and slave have no place inside this driver. It is really a traditional client server model, so use those names. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger --- Isn't this an externally visible change? Or do we not provide any guarantees fo

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 26/27] memif: replace master/slave with server/client

2020-07-01 Thread Stephen Hemminger
The names master and slave have no place inside this driver. It is really a traditional client server model, so use those names. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger --- doc/guides/nics/memif.rst | 78 +- drivers/net/memif/memif.h | 40 +- drivers/net/memif/