[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] ethdev: add optional rxtx callback support

2015-02-20 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-02-20 10:06, Bruce Richardson: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 05:56:41PM +, John McNamara wrote: > > From: Richardson, Bruce > > > > Add optional support for inline processing of packets inside the RX > > or TX call. For an RX callback, what happens is that we get a set of > > packets from th

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] ethdev: add optional rxtx callback support

2015-02-20 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 05:56:41PM +, John McNamara wrote: > From: Richardson, Bruce > > Add optional support for inline processing of packets inside the RX > or TX call. For an RX callback, what happens is that we get a set of > packets from the NIC and then pass them to a callback function,

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] ethdev: add optional rxtx callback support

2015-02-19 Thread John McNamara
From: Richardson, Bruce Add optional support for inline processing of packets inside the RX or TX call. For an RX callback, what happens is that we get a set of packets from the NIC and then pass them to a callback function, if configured, to allow additional processing to be done on them, e.g. f