On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 8:34 AM Ibtisam Tariq wrote:
>
> Instead of using getopt_long return value, strcmp was used to
> compare the input parameters with the struct option array. This
> patch get rid of all those strcmp by directly binding each longopt
> with an int enum. This is to improve readab
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 11:48 AM Ibtisam Tariq wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 2:59 PM David Marchand
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 8:34 AM Ibtisam Tariq
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Instead of using getopt_long return value, strcmp was used to
>> > compare the input parameters with the struct
Hi David,
Thanks for the recommendation. In future, I will add a cover letter for a
long patch set.
If you want, I can submit the cover letter for this patch set too.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 2:59 PM David Marchand
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 8:34 AM Ibtisam Tariq
> wrote:
> >
> > Instead o
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 8:34 AM Ibtisam Tariq wrote:
>
> Instead of using getopt_long return value, strcmp was used to
> compare the input parameters with the struct option array. This
> patch get rid of all those strcmp by directly binding each longopt
> with an int enum. This is to improve readab
Instead of using getopt_long return value, strcmp was used to
compare the input parameters with the struct option array. This
patch get rid of all those strcmp by directly binding each longopt
with an int enum. This is to improve readability and consistency in
all examples.
Bugzilla ID: 238
Cc: ma
5 matches
Mail list logo
