On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 10:31:15AM +, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2015 3:51 PM
> > To: Wu, Jingjing
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> > S
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2015 3:51 PM
> To: Wu, Jingjing
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] ethdev: rename
> rte_eth_vmdq_mirror_conf
>
&
Thanks for the clarification.
Jingjing
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 10:51 PM
> To: Wu, Jingjing
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; nhorman at tuxdriver.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1
2015-06-26 07:03, Wu, Jingjing:
> Hi, Neil
>
> About this patch I have an ABI concern about it.
> This patch just renamed a struct rte_eth_vmdq_mirror_conf to
> rte_eth_mirror_conf, the size and its elements don't change.
> As my understanding, it will not break the ABI. And I also tested it.
> B
xdriver.com'
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] ethdev: rename
> rte_eth_vmdq_mirror_conf
>
> Hi, Neil
>
> About this patch I have an ABI concern about it.
> This patch just renamed a struct rte_eth_vmdq_mirror_conf to
> rte_eth_mirror_co
Hi, Neil
About this patch I have an ABI concern about it.
This patch just renamed a struct rte_eth_vmdq_mirror_conf to
rte_eth_mirror_conf, the size and its elements don't change. As my
understanding, it will not break the ABI. And I also tested it.
But when I use the script ./scripts/validate
rename rte_eth_vmdq_mirror_conf to rte_eth_mirror_conf and move
the maximum rule id check from ethdev level to driver
Signed-off-by: Jingjing Wu
---
app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 22 +++---
drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 11 +++
drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h |
7 matches
Mail list logo
