[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/17] support multi-pthread per core

2015-02-06 Thread Olivier MATZ
On 02/06/2015 08:24 PM, Robert Sanford wrote: > Sorry if I missed something, but after reading the mailing list threads > about this subject, I cannot find an explanation about what problem > this series try to solve. > > Can you give some details about which use-case require to h

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/17] support multi-pthread per core

2015-02-06 Thread Olivier MATZ
Hi, On 02/02/2015 03:02 AM, Cunming Liang wrote: > v4 changes: > new patch fixing strnlen() invalid return in 32bit icc [03/17] > update and add more comments on sched_yield() [16/17] > > v3 changes: > new patch adding sched_yield() in rte_ring to avoid long spin [16/17] > > v2 changes: >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/17] support multi-pthread per core

2015-02-06 Thread Robert Sanford
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Olivier MATZ wrote: > Hi, > > On 02/02/2015 03:02 AM, Cunming Liang wrote: > > v4 changes: > > new patch fixing strnlen() invalid return in 32bit icc [03/17] > > update and add more comments on sched_yield() [16/17] > > > > v3 changes: > > new patch adding sc

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/17] support multi-pthread per core

2015-02-02 Thread Cunming Liang
v4 changes: new patch fixing strnlen() invalid return in 32bit icc [03/17] update and add more comments on sched_yield() [16/17] v3 changes: new patch adding sched_yield() in rte_ring to avoid long spin [16/17] v2 changes: add '-' support for EAL option '--lcores' [02/17] The patch serie