On 23-Jul-19 2:56 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 23-Jul-19 11:25 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
23/07/2019 11:57, Burakov, Anatoly:
A machine without an IOMMU shouldn't have picked IOVA as VA in the first
place. Perhaps this is something we could fix? I'm not sure how to
detected that condition tho
On 23-Jul-19 11:25 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
23/07/2019 11:57, Burakov, Anatoly:
A machine without an IOMMU shouldn't have picked IOVA as VA in the first
place. Perhaps this is something we could fix? I'm not sure how to
detected that condition though, i don't think there's a mechanism to
know
23/07/2019 11:57, Burakov, Anatoly:
> A machine without an IOMMU shouldn't have picked IOVA as VA in the first
> place. Perhaps this is something we could fix? I'm not sure how to
> detected that condition though, i don't think there's a mechanism to
> know that for sure. Some kernels create a "
; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [EXT] RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] Fixes on IOVA mode
selection
This introduces a regression where uio-bound devies are attached to
a
DPDK
app at runtime.
Just to understand the requirements;
# Is this requirement for SPDK?
# Is brand new
23/07/2019 07:27, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran:
> From: Stojaczyk, Dariusz
> > From: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran [mailto:jer...@marvell.com]
> > > From: Stojaczyk, Dariusz
> > > >
> > > > This introduces a regression where uio-bound devies are attached to
> > > > a DPDK app at runtime.
Yes it is a re
> -Original Message-
> From: Stojaczyk, Dariusz
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2019 10:24 AM
> To: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran ; Thomas Monjalon
> ; David Marchand ;
> Burakov, Anatoly
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [EXT] RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] Fixe
avid Marchand
> > ; Burakov, Anatoly
> > ; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
> >
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [EXT] RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] Fixes on IOVA mode selection
> >
> > This introduces a regression where uio-bound devies are attached to a
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Stojaczyk, Dariusz
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2019 9:06 AM
> To: Thomas Monjalon ; David Marchand
> ; Burakov, Anatoly
> ; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [EXT] RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] Fixes on IO
patch?
D.
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2019 5:53 PM
> To: David Marchand ; Burakov, Anatoly
> ; jer...@marvell.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] Fi
22/07/2019 14:56, David Marchand:
> Following the issues reported by Jerin and the discussion that emerged
> from it, here are fixes to restore and document the behavior of the EAL
> and the pci bus driver.
>
> I pondered all the arguments and tried to have the less changes
> possible.
> I can't f
Following the issues reported by Jerin and the discussion that emerged
from it, here are fixes to restore and document the behavior of the EAL
and the pci bus driver.
I pondered all the arguments and tried to have the less changes
possible.
I can't find a need for a flag to just announce support o
11 matches
Mail list logo
