gt; Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] timer library enhancement
>
> Let's revive these patches.
> Erik, could you rebase them with experimental tag, please?
>
> Someone for a review?
>
>
> 11/10/2017 22:42, Thomas Monjalon:
> > This patchset is waiting for rev
Let's revive these patches.
Erik, could you rebase them with experimental tag, please?
Someone for a review?
11/10/2017 22:42, Thomas Monjalon:
> This patchset is waiting for review.
>
> Robert, are you available?
>
> 19/09/2017 19:02, Erik Gabriel Carrillo:
> > In the current implementation o
This patchset is waiting for review.
Robert, are you available?
19/09/2017 19:02, Erik Gabriel Carrillo:
> In the current implementation of the DPDK timer library, timers can be
> created and set to be handled by a target lcore by adding it to a
> skiplist that corresponds to that lcore. However
In the current implementation of the DPDK timer library, timers can be
created and set to be handled by a target lcore by adding it to a
skiplist that corresponds to that lcore. However, if an application
enables multiple lcores, and each of these lcores repeatedly attempts
to install timers on th
4 matches
Mail list logo
