> > The problem is that with new approach you proposed there is no simple way
> > for PMD to
> > fulfil that requirement.
> > In current version of DPDK:
> > - PMD reports size of private data, note that it reports extra space needed
> >to align its data properly inside provided buffer.
> >
> The problem is that with new approach you proposed there is no simple way
> for PMD to
> fulfil that requirement.
> In current version of DPDK:
> - PMD reports size of private data, note that it reports extra space needed
>to align its data properly inside provided buffer.
> - Then it ss up t
> > > As per current design, rte_cryptodev_sym_session_create() and
> > > rte_cryptodev_sym_session_init() use separate mempool objects
> > > for a single session.
> > > And structure rte_cryptodev_sym_session is not directly used
> > > by the application, it may cause ABI breakage if the structu
> > As per current design, rte_cryptodev_sym_session_create() and
> > rte_cryptodev_sym_session_init() use separate mempool objects
> > for a single session.
> > And structure rte_cryptodev_sym_session is not directly used
> > by the application, it may cause ABI breakage if the structure
> > is
Hi Akhil,
> As per current design, rte_cryptodev_sym_session_create() and
> rte_cryptodev_sym_session_init() use separate mempool objects
> for a single session.
> And structure rte_cryptodev_sym_session is not directly used
> by the application, it may cause ABI breakage if the structure
> is
5 matches
Mail list logo
