On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 02:00:54PM +, Matan Azrad wrote:
> Hi Gaetan
>
> > > > Your environment does not include the function, but this is within
> > > > fs_flow_destroy (please update to include the context by the way it
> > > > helps a lot the review :). Afterward, line 162 ret is directl
Hi Gaetan
From: Gaëtan Rivet, Monday, January 8, 2018 3:47 PM
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 12:55:49PM +, Matan Azrad wrote:
> > Hi Gaetan
> >
> > From: Gaëtan Rivet, Monday, January 8, 2018 12:58 PM
> > > Hi Matan,
> > >
> > > Sorry for the delay on this.
> > >
> >
> > It's OK in spite of I need
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 12:55:49PM +, Matan Azrad wrote:
> Hi Gaetan
>
> From: Gaëtan Rivet, Monday, January 8, 2018 12:58 PM
> > Hi Matan,
> >
> > Sorry for the delay on this.
> >
>
> It's OK in spite of I need to fetch it back :)
>
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:58:29AM +, Matan Azra
Hi Gaetan
From: Gaëtan Rivet, Monday, January 8, 2018 12:58 PM
> Hi Matan,
>
> Sorry for the delay on this.
>
It's OK in spite of I need to fetch it back :)
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:58:29AM +, Matan Azrad wrote:
> > Hi Gaetan
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Gaëtan Rive
Hi Matan,
Sorry for the delay on this.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:58:29AM +, Matan Azrad wrote:
> Hi Gaetan
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gaëtan Rivet [mailto:gaetan.ri...@6wind.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 12:22 AM
> > To: Matan Azrad
> > Cc: Adrien Mazarguil ;
Hi Gaetan
> -Original Message-
> From: Gaëtan Rivet [mailto:gaetan.ri...@6wind.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 12:22 AM
> To: Matan Azrad
> Cc: Adrien Mazarguil ; Thomas Monjalon
> ; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] net/failsafe: fix removed device handling
>
> Hi Mat
Hi Matan,
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 05:10:15PM +, Matan Azrad wrote:
> There is time between the physical removal of the device until
> sub-device PMDs get a RMV interrupt. At this time DPDK PMDs and
> applications still don't know about the removal and may call sub-device
> control operation wh
There is time between the physical removal of the device until
sub-device PMDs get a RMV interrupt. At this time DPDK PMDs and
applications still don't know about the removal and may call sub-device
control operation which should return an error.
In previous code this error is reported to the appl
8 matches
Mail list logo