Konstantin
>> ; Doherty, Declan
>> ; DPDK
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] bonding: take queue spinlock in rx/tx
>> burst functions
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 06:01:45PM +, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>>> On 6/16/2016 7:38 PM, thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com
Hi Ferruh,
> -Original Message-
> From: Richardson, Bruce
> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 9:14 AM
> To: Yigit, Ferruh
> Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; Iremonger, Bernard
> ; Ananyev, Konstantin
> ; Doherty, Declan
> ; DPDK
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] b
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 06:01:45PM +, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 6/16/2016 7:38 PM, thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com (Thomas Monjalon) wrote:
> > 2016-06-16 16:41, Iremonger, Bernard:
> >> Hi Thomas,
> >>
> >>> 2016-06-16 15:32, Bruce Richardson:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 01:28:08PM +0100, Irem
On 6/16/2016 7:38 PM, thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com (Thomas Monjalon) wrote:
> 2016-06-16 16:41, Iremonger, Bernard:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>>> 2016-06-16 15:32, Bruce Richardson:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 01:28:08PM +0100, Iremonger, Bernard wrote:
>> Why does this particular PMD need spinlocks w
Hi Bernard,
This is an old patch, sorry for commenting after this long.
On 6/12/2016 6:11 PM, Bernard Iremonger wrote:
> Use rte_spinlock_trylock() in the rx/tx burst functions to
> take the queue spinlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger
> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev
> ---
...
> stat
2016-06-16 16:41, Iremonger, Bernard:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> > 2016-06-16 15:32, Bruce Richardson:
> > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 01:28:08PM +0100, Iremonger, Bernard wrote:
> > > > > Why does this particular PMD need spinlocks when doing RX and TX,
> > > > > while other device types do not? How is addin
2016-06-16 15:32, Bruce Richardson:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 01:28:08PM +0100, Iremonger, Bernard wrote:
> > > Why does this particular PMD need spinlocks when doing RX and TX, while
> > > other device types do not? How is adding/removing devices from a bonded
> > > device different to other contr
Hi Thomas,
> 2016-06-16 15:32, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 01:28:08PM +0100, Iremonger, Bernard wrote:
> > > > Why does this particular PMD need spinlocks when doing RX and TX,
> > > > while other device types do not? How is adding/removing devices
> > > > from a bonded device di
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 01:28:08PM +0100, Iremonger, Bernard wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
>
>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] bonding: take queue spinlock in rx/tx
> > burst functions
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 06:11:28PM +0100, Bernard Iremonger w
Hi Bruce,
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] bonding: take queue spinlock in rx/tx
> burst functions
>
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 06:11:28PM +0100, Bernard Iremonger wrote:
> > Use rte_spinlock_trylock() in the rx/tx burst functions to take the
> > queue spinloc
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 06:11:28PM +0100, Bernard Iremonger wrote:
> Use rte_spinlock_trylock() in the rx/tx burst functions to
> take the queue spinlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger
> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev
> ---
Why does this particular PMD need spinlocks when doing RX and TX,
Use rte_spinlock_trylock() in the rx/tx burst functions to
take the queue spinlock.
Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev
---
drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c | 116 -
1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/d
12 matches
Mail list logo
