On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 02:53:57PM +, Harry van Haaren wrote:
> Large port enqueue sizes were not supported as the value
> it was stored in was a uint8_t. Using uint8_ts to save
> space in config apis makes no sense - increasing the 3
> instances of uint8_t enqueue / dequeue depths to more
> ap
Large port enqueue sizes were not supported as the value
it was stored in was a uint8_t. Using uint8_ts to save
space in config apis makes no sense - increasing the 3
instances of uint8_t enqueue / dequeue depths to more
appropriate values (based on the context around them).
Signed-off-by: Harry v
2 matches
Mail list logo
