On 12/19/2017 5:14 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
> This fail-safe series should improve some cycles in failsafe data path.
> It is obvious that we cannot improve a lot because the most of data path
> functionality are done by the sub devices data path.
> So the expectation from this series is just to imp
Hi Ferruh,
Only a quick question, otherwise they will probably get in rather soon.
Apologies for the delay.
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 05:58:02PM +, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 12/19/2017 5:14 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
> > This fail-safe series should improve some cycles in failsafe data path.
> > It
On 12/19/2017 5:14 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
> This fail-safe series should improve some cycles in failsafe data path.
> It is obvious that we cannot improve a lot because the most of data path
> functionality are done by the sub devices data path.
> So the expectation from this series is just to imp
All this series patches are V1.
Sorry for V3 mistake.
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Matan Azrad
> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 7:14 PM
> To: Gaetan Rivet
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] improve fa
This fail-safe series should improve some cycles in failsafe data path.
It is obvious that we cannot improve a lot because the most of data path
functionality are done by the sub devices data path.
So the expectation from this series is just to improve some cycles in sub
devices management done b
5 matches
Mail list logo