> -Original Message-
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 9:48 PM
> To: Wang, Haiyue ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: pvale...@redhat.com; acon...@redhat.com;
> david.march...@redhat.com; Zhang, Qi Z ; Rong, Leyi
> ; Tu, Lijuan ;
> ruifeng.w...@arm.com; feifei.wa...@arm.com;
>
> There is an 82599 errata that UDP frames with a zero checksum are
> incorrectly marked as checksum invalid by the hardware. This was
> leading to misleading PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD flag.
>
> This patch changes the bad UDP checksum to PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN,
> so the software application will th
Haiyue Wang writes:
> There is an 82599 errata that UDP frames with a zero checksum are
> incorrectly marked as checksum invalid by the hardware. This was
> leading to misleading PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD flag.
>
> This patch changes the bad UDP checksum to PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN,
> so the software a
Hi Haiyue,
Haiyue Wang writes:
> There is an 82599 errata that UDP frames with a zero checksum are
> incorrectly marked as checksum invalid by the hardware. This was
> leading to misleading PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD flag.
>
> This patch changes the bad UDP checksum to PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN,
> so th
There is an 82599 errata that UDP frames with a zero checksum are
incorrectly marked as checksum invalid by the hardware. This was
leading to misleading PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD flag.
This patch changes the bad UDP checksum to PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN,
so the software application will then have to reco
5 matches
Mail list logo
