On 11/18, Qi Zhang wrote:
>Flow type "IPv4 + UDP" or "IPv4 + TCP" is conflict with "IPv4 + any"
>flow type. If a rule for IPv4 + any is created, we should reject any rule
>for IPv4 + UDP otherwise the first rule may be impacted, same decision
>should be made on a reverse order.
>For IPv6 and IPv4 G
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhang, Qi Z
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 2:35 PM
> To: Xing, Beilei ; Cao, Yahui
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z
> Subject: [PATCH v3] net/ice: fix FDIR flow type conflict
>
> Flow type "IPv4 + UDP" or "IPv4 + TCP" is conflict with "IPv4 + any"
> flow
Flow type "IPv4 + UDP" or "IPv4 + TCP" is conflict with "IPv4 + any"
flow type. If a rule for IPv4 + any is created, we should reject any rule
for IPv4 + UDP otherwise the first rule may be impacted, same decision
should be made on a reverse order.
For IPv6 and IPv4 GTPU inner case, we have the sam
3 matches
Mail list logo
