On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 05:53:46AM +, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
> With the API and ABI freeze ahead, it will be good to reserve
> some bits on the private structure for future use.
>
> Otherwise we will potentially need to maintain two different
> private structure during 2020 period.
>
> There is
Sunday, November 24, 2019 8:05 PM, Thomas Monjalon:
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] mbuf: extend pktmbuf pool private
> structure
>
> 24/11/2019 18:50, Stephen Hemminger:
> > On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 05:53:46 +
> > Shahaf Shuler wrote:
> >
> > > diff -
24/11/2019 18:50, Stephen Hemminger:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 05:53:46 +
> Shahaf Shuler wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c
> > index 35df1c4c38..8fa7f49645 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c
> > @@ -49,
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 05:53:46 +
Shahaf Shuler wrote:
> diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c
> index 35df1c4c38..8fa7f49645 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ rte_pktmbuf_pool_init(struct rte_mempool *
With the API and ABI freeze ahead, it will be good to reserve
some bits on the private structure for future use.
Otherwise we will potentially need to maintain two different
private structure during 2020 period.
There is already one use case for those reserved bits[1]
The reserved field should b
5 matches
Mail list logo
