[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] mbuf/ip_frag: Move mbuf chaining to common code

2015-10-13 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-13 14:50, Simon Kagstrom: > Ping? OK you apply the ping method we have just talked about :) To make it really effective, you should have these headers: To: Olivier Matz Cc: dev at dpdk.org Indeed, as the mbuf maintainer, he's the target of your ping. And to make it clear,

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] mbuf/ip_frag: Move mbuf chaining to common code

2015-10-13 Thread Olivier MATZ
Hi Simon, On 09/07/2015 02:50 PM, Simon Kagstrom wrote: > Chaining/segmenting mbufs can be useful in many places, so make it > global. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Kagstrom > Signed-off-by: Johan Faltstrom > > [...] > > --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h > +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h > @@ -177

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] mbuf/ip_frag: Move mbuf chaining to common code

2015-10-13 Thread Simon Kagstrom
Ping? // Simon On Mon, 7 Sep 2015 14:50:09 +0200 Simon Kagstrom wrote: > Chaining/segmenting mbufs can be useful in many places, so make it > global. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Kagstrom > Signed-off-by: Johan Faltstrom > --- > ChangeLog: > v2: > * Check for nb_segs byte overflow (Olivier MAT

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] mbuf/ip_frag: Move mbuf chaining to common code

2015-09-07 Thread Simon Kagstrom
Chaining/segmenting mbufs can be useful in many places, so make it global. Signed-off-by: Simon Kagstrom Signed-off-by: Johan Faltstrom --- ChangeLog: v2: * Check for nb_segs byte overflow (Olivier MATZ) * Don't reset nb_segs in tail (Olivier MATZ) v3: * Describe performance implications o