Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] eal: refactor rte_eal_init into sub-functions

2024-01-19 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 08:58:17 -0800 Rahul Gupta wrote: > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c > index 9e4e99e53b..345f3c1c04 100644 > --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c > +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c > @@ -4531,6 +4531,8 @@ main(int argc, char** argv) > portid_t port_id; >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] eal: refactor rte_eal_init into sub-functions

2024-01-19 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 08:58:17AM -0800, Rahul Gupta wrote: > From: Rahul Gupta > > In continuation to the following email, I am sending this patch. > (https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/20231110172523.ga17...@microsoft.com/) > > Initialization requires rte_eal_init + rte_pktmbuf_pool_create which > ca

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] eal: refactor rte_eal_init into sub-functions

2024-01-19 Thread Rahul Gupta
From: Rahul Gupta In continuation to the following email, I am sending this patch. (https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/20231110172523.ga17...@microsoft.com/) Initialization requires rte_eal_init + rte_pktmbuf_pool_create which can consume a total time of 500-600 ms: a) For many devices FLR may take a si