On Sat, 24 Jul 2021 09:58:44 +0200
Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 23/07/2021 17:45, Stephen Hemminger:
> > The first argument to rte_bsf32_safe was incorrectly declared as
> > a 64 bit value. The code only works on 32 bit values and the underlying
> > function rte_bsf32 only accepts 32 bit values. This
23/07/2021 17:45, Stephen Hemminger:
> The first argument to rte_bsf32_safe was incorrectly declared as
> a 64 bit value. The code only works on 32 bit values and the underlying
> function rte_bsf32 only accepts 32 bit values. This was a mistake
> introduced when the safe version was added and prob
The first argument to rte_bsf32_safe was incorrectly declared as
a 64 bit value. The code only works on 32 bit values and the underlying
function rte_bsf32 only accepts 32 bit values. This was a mistake
introduced when the safe version was added and probably cause
by copy/paste from the 64 bit vers
3 matches
Mail list logo
