Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] bpf: remove experimental tag

2020-09-16 Thread David Marchand
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 4:11 PM Conor Walsh wrote: > > The BPF lib was introduced in 18.05. > There were no changes in it's public API since 19.11. > It should be mature enough to remove it's 'experimental' tag. > RTE_BPF_XTYPE_NUM is also being dropped from rte_bpf_xtype to > avoid possible ABI p

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] bpf: remove experimental tag

2020-09-16 Thread Ananyev, Konstantin
> > The BPF lib was introduced in 18.05. > There were no changes in it's public API since 19.11. > It should be mature enough to remove it's 'experimental' tag. > RTE_BPF_XTYPE_NUM is also being dropped from rte_bpf_xtype to > avoid possible ABI problems in the future. > > --- > v2: RTE_BPF_XTYPE

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] bpf: remove experimental tag

2020-09-14 Thread Conor Walsh
The BPF lib was introduced in 18.05. There were no changes in it's public API since 19.11. It should be mature enough to remove it's 'experimental' tag. RTE_BPF_XTYPE_NUM is also being dropped from rte_bpf_xtype to avoid possible ABI problems in the future. --- v2: RTE_BPF_XTYPE_NUM dropped from r