Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] examples/ipsec-secgw: handle ESN soft limit event

2018-03-21 Thread Akhil Goyal
Hi Anoob, On 3/21/2018 10:50 AM, Anoob Joseph wrote: Hi Akhil, If you are fine with the existing code, I'll send a revised patchset incorporating the comment change you had suggested for 3rd patch. Shall I proceed? Thanks, Anoob Yes you can send the patchset with existing code. BTW we ar

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] examples/ipsec-secgw: handle ESN soft limit event

2018-03-20 Thread Anoob Joseph
Hi Akhil, If you are fine with the existing code, I'll send a revised patchset incorporating the comment change you had suggested for 3rd patch. Shall I proceed? Thanks, Anoob On 14/03/18 11:36, Anoob Joseph wrote: Hi Akhil, Please see inline. Thanks, Anoob On 13/03/18 17:54, Akhil Goyal

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] examples/ipsec-secgw: handle ESN soft limit event

2018-03-13 Thread Anoob Joseph
Hi Akhil, Please see inline. Thanks, Anoob On 13/03/18 17:54, Akhil Goyal wrote: Hi Anoob, On 3/1/2018 2:51 PM, Anoob Joseph wrote: For inline protocol processing, the PMD/device is required to maintain the ESN. But the application is required to monitor ESN overflow to initiate SA expiry.

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] examples/ipsec-secgw: handle ESN soft limit event

2018-03-13 Thread Akhil Goyal
Hi Anoob, On 3/1/2018 2:51 PM, Anoob Joseph wrote: For inline protocol processing, the PMD/device is required to maintain the ESN. But the application is required to monitor ESN overflow to initiate SA expiry. For such cases, application would set the ESN soft limit. An IPsec event would be rai

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] examples/ipsec-secgw: handle ESN soft limit event

2018-03-01 Thread Anoob Joseph
For inline protocol processing, the PMD/device is required to maintain the ESN. But the application is required to monitor ESN overflow to initiate SA expiry. For such cases, application would set the ESN soft limit. An IPsec event would be raised by rte_eth_event framework, when ESN hits the soft