On 3/30/2017 9:42 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> For info, Ferruh did a similar patch:
> http://dpdk.org/patch/22443
> Ferruh, OK to keep Bruce one?
Sure, go for it, they both do same thing.
>
> 2017-03-30 16:33, Bruce Richardson:
>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 04:36:11PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon
For info, Ferruh did a similar patch:
http://dpdk.org/patch/22443
Ferruh, OK to keep Bruce one?
2017-03-30 16:33, Bruce Richardson:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 04:36:11PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2017-03-29 17:38, Bruce Richardson:
> > > Since the test app is no longer being build b
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 04:36:11PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2017-03-29 17:38, Bruce Richardson:
> > Since the test app is no longer being build by default as part of a build,
> > we need to update the testbuild script to take account of this.
> [...]
> > --- a/devtools/test-build.sh
> > +++
2017-03-29 17:38, Bruce Richardson:
> Since the test app is no longer being build by default as part of a build,
> we need to update the testbuild script to take account of this.
[...]
> --- a/devtools/test-build.sh
> +++ b/devtools/test-build.sh
> @@ -229,6 +229,9 @@ for conf in $configs ; do
>
On 29/03/2017 5:38 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
Since the test app is no longer being build by default as part of a build,
we need to update the testbuild script to take account of this.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson
---
V2: added in test-build as a new build action, since it skips the testpmd
Since the test app is no longer being build by default as part of a build,
we need to update the testbuild script to take account of this.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson
---
V2: added in test-build as a new build action, since it skips the testpmd
build when run.
---
devtools/test-build.sh |
6 matches
Mail list logo
