> -Original Message-
> From: Adrien Mazarguil [mailto:adrien.mazarg...@6wind.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 5:20 PM
> To: Zhang, Qi Z
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Doherty, Declan ; Chandran,
> Sugesh ; Glynn, Michael J
> ; Liu, Yu Y ; Ananyev,
> Konstantin ; Richardson, Bruce
>
> Subject:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:12:08AM +, Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
> Hi Adrien:
>
> Thank you so much for your careful review and helpful suggestions!
> I agree with most of your comments, except couple question about
> RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_TGT_ADDR and RTE_FLOW_ITEM_IPV6_EXT_HDR
> Plea
Hi Adrien:
Thank you so much for your careful review and helpful suggestions!
I agree with most of your comments, except couple question about
RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_TGT_ADDR and RTE_FLOW_ITEM_IPV6_EXT_HDR
Please see my comment inline.
Thanks!
Qi
> -Original Message-
On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 05:19:21PM -0400, Qi Zhang wrote:
> Add new protocol header match support as below
>
> RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ARP
> - match IPv4 ARP header
> RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_EXT_HDR_ANY
> - match any IPv6 extension header
While properly defined in the patch, "IPV6" is missing h
Add new protocol header match support as below
RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ARP
- match IPv4 ARP header
RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_EXT_HDR_ANY
- match any IPv6 extension header
RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ICMPV6
- match IPv6 ICMP header
RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ICMPV6_TGT_ADDR
- match IPv6 ICMP Tar
5 matches
Mail list logo