Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] rxtx_callbacks: Add support for HW timestamp

2019-04-02 Thread Tom Barbette
Le 02/04/2019 à 20:22, Ferruh Yigit a écrit : Same comment as ethdev one, above code assume if driver announces 'DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TIMESTAMP' capability, it have to implement 'read_clock' dev_ops, should it be the case? Write now only mlx implements it so this is not a problem at all, but I don't k

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] rxtx_callbacks: Add support for HW timestamp

2019-04-02 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 3/27/2019 6:19 AM, Tom Barbette wrote: > Use rxtx callback to demonstrate a way to use rte_eth_read_clock to > convert the hardware timestamps to an amount of cycles. > > This allows to get the amount of time the packet spent since its entry > in the device. While the regular latency only shows

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] rxtx_callbacks: Add support for HW timestamp

2019-03-26 Thread Tom Barbette
Use rxtx callback to demonstrate a way to use rte_eth_read_clock to convert the hardware timestamps to an amount of cycles. This allows to get the amount of time the packet spent since its entry in the device. While the regular latency only shows the latency from when it entered the software stack