As discussed offline, this will lead to many DRIVER OK among
dev_stop()/dev_start(). I'll remove this patch.
Thanks,
Jianfeng
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 26, 2016 4:02 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Yi
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 06:55:16AM +, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com]
> > Sent: Monday, December 26, 2016 2:27 PM
> > To: Tan, Jianfeng
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh; Liang, Cunming
> > Subject: Re: [PATC
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 26, 2016 2:27 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh; Liang, Cunming
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] net/virtio_user: postpone DRIVER OK notification
>
> On Fri, Dec 23,
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 07:14:21AM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
> In driver probe phase, we obtain device information; and then virtio
> driver will initialize device and stores info, like negotiated
> features, in vhost_user layer; finally, vhost_user gets DRIVER_OK
> notification from virtio driver
In driver probe phase, we obtain device information; and then virtio
driver will initialize device and stores info, like negotiated
features, in vhost_user layer; finally, vhost_user gets DRIVER_OK
notification from virtio driver, and then sync with backend device.
Previously, DRIVER_OK could be s
5 matches
Mail list logo