Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] mbuf: move mbuf definition into a separate file

2019-10-16 Thread Olivier Matz
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 02:50:53PM +0100, Konstantin Ananyev wrote: > Right now inclusion of rte_mbuf.h header can cause inclusion of > some arch/os specific headers. > That prevents it to be included directly by some > non-DPDK (but related) entities: KNI, BPF programs, etc. > To overcome that pro

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] mbuf: move mbuf definition into a separate file

2019-10-02 Thread Michel Machado
Acked-by: Michel Machado [ ]'s Michel Machado On 9/27/19 9:50 AM, Konstantin Ananyev wrote: Right now inclusion of rte_mbuf.h header can cause inclusion of some arch/os specific headers. That prevents it to be included directly by some non-DPDK (but related) entities: KNI, BPF programs, etc. T

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] mbuf: move mbuf definition into a separate file

2019-09-27 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
On 9/27/19 4:50 PM, Konstantin Ananyev wrote: Right now inclusion of rte_mbuf.h header can cause inclusion of some arch/os specific headers. That prevents it to be included directly by some non-DPDK (but related) entities: KNI, BPF programs, etc. To overcome that problem usually a separate defini

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] mbuf: move mbuf definition into a separate file

2019-09-27 Thread Konstantin Ananyev
Right now inclusion of rte_mbuf.h header can cause inclusion of some arch/os specific headers. That prevents it to be included directly by some non-DPDK (but related) entities: KNI, BPF programs, etc. To overcome that problem usually a separate definitions of rte_mbuf structure is created within th