Although there's no functional need for them I considered keeping it for
maintainability reasons:
1. Keep the call flow more aligned with pcap (file) that has separated
open_rx_pcap()/open_tx_pcap()
2. If in future there'll rise a need for different functionality between rx and
tx then it will b
On 6/20/2018 7:06 PM, Ido Goshen wrote:
> Although there's no functional need for them I considered keeping it for
> maintainability reasons:
> 1. Keep the call flow more aligned with pcap (file) that has separated
> open_rx_pcap()/open_tx_pcap()
> 2. If in future there'll rise a need for differe
On 6/19/2018 3:37 PM, ido goshen wrote:
> Signed-off-by: ido goshen
<...>
> /*
> + * Opens a NIC for reading packets from it
> + */
> +static inline int
> +open_rx_iface(const char *key, const char *value, void *extra_args)
> +{
> + return open_iface(key, value, extra_args);
> +}
> +
> +/*
Signed-off-by: ido goshen
---
drivers/net/pcap/rte_eth_pcap.c | 77 +
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/pcap/rte_eth_pcap.c b/drivers/net/pcap/rte_eth_pcap.c
index b4f81ac..b21930b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/pcap/rte_
4 matches
Mail list logo
