Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] eal: rename dev init API for consistency

2016-12-05 Thread Shreyansh Jain
On Monday 05 December 2016 03:54 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote: On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 03:42:18PM +0530, Shreyansh Jain wrote: Hello Jerin, Hello Shreyansh, On Sunday 04 December 2016 02:25 AM, Jerin Jacob wrote: rte_eal_dev_init() is a misleading name. It actually performs the driver->probe for

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] eal: rename dev init API for consistency

2016-12-05 Thread Jerin Jacob
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 03:42:18PM +0530, Shreyansh Jain wrote: > Hello Jerin, Hello Shreyansh, > > On Sunday 04 December 2016 02:25 AM, Jerin Jacob wrote: > > rte_eal_dev_init() is a misleading name. > > It actually performs the driver->probe for vdev, > > which is parallel to rte_eal_pci_probe

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] eal: rename dev init API for consistency

2016-12-05 Thread Shreyansh Jain
Hello Jerin, On Sunday 04 December 2016 02:25 AM, Jerin Jacob wrote: rte_eal_dev_init() is a misleading name. It actually performs the driver->probe for vdev, which is parallel to rte_eal_pci_probe. Changed to rte_eal_vdev_probe for consistency and moved the vdev specific probe to eal_common_vd

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] eal: rename dev init API for consistency

2016-12-03 Thread Jerin Jacob
rte_eal_dev_init() is a misleading name. It actually performs the driver->probe for vdev, which is parallel to rte_eal_pci_probe. Changed to rte_eal_vdev_probe for consistency and moved the vdev specific probe to eal_common_vdev.c Suggested-by: Shreyansh Jain Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob --- dri