Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] ethdev: update modify field flow action

2021-10-11 Thread Ori Kam
Hi Slava, > -Original Message- > From: Slava Ovsiienko > Sent: Monday, October 11, 2021 2:46 AM > Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] ethdev: update modify field flow action > > The generic modify field flow action introduced in [1] has some issues > related to the immediate source > operand: > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] ethdev: update modify field flow action

2021-10-11 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
On 10/11/21 2:45 AM, Viacheslav Ovsiienko wrote: > The generic modify field flow action introduced in [1] has > some issues related to the immediate source operand: > > - immediate source can be presented either as an unsigned > 64-bit integer or pointer to data pattern in memory. > Ther

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] ethdev: update modify field flow action

2021-10-10 Thread Viacheslav Ovsiienko
The generic modify field flow action introduced in [1] has some issues related to the immediate source operand: - immediate source can be presented either as an unsigned 64-bit integer or pointer to data pattern in memory. There was no explicit pointer field defined in the union. - th