05/03/2019 18:40, Gaëtan Rivet:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 05:43:26PM +0100, Gaëtan Rivet wrote:
> > I have had a little trouble reading the patches. I think the 3 first
> > should be squashed into a single one, it would be more coherent.
> >
> > I think I have seen a few points where doing so woul
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 05:43:26PM +0100, Gaëtan Rivet wrote:
> Hello Raslan,
>
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> I have had a little trouble reading the patches. I think the 3 first
> should be squashed into a single one, it would be more coherent.
>
> I think I have seen a few points where doing so w
Hello Raslan,
Sorry for the delay.
I have had a little trouble reading the patches. I think the 3 first
should be squashed into a single one, it would be more coherent.
I think I have seen a few points where doing so would have prevented
some unnecessary changes for example, simplifying the seri
In multiprocess context, the private structure is shared between
processes. The back reference from private to generic data was using
a pointer to a per process eth_dev. It's now changed to a reference of
the shared data.
Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh
Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon
---
driver
4 matches
Mail list logo
