> > >> In the current implementation,
> > >> the action rte_flow_action_modify_field is not well defined
> > >> for fields larger than 64 bits (for example IPv6 source)
> > >> In addition, the byte order is also not well defined.
> > >>
> > >> Both of those issue should be fixed.
> > >>
> > >> Sign
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 5:40 PM Andrew Rybchenko
wrote:
>
> On 8/3/21 9:10 PM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 1:58 AM Ori Kam wrote:
> >>
> >> In the current implementation,
> >> the action rte_flow_action_modify_field is not well defined
> >> for fields larger than 64 bits (for e
On 8/3/21 9:10 PM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 1:58 AM Ori Kam wrote:
In the current implementation,
the action rte_flow_action_modify_field is not well defined
for fields larger than 64 bits (for example IPv6 source)
In addition, the byte order is also not well defined.
Both
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 1:58 AM Ori Kam wrote:
>
> In the current implementation,
> the action rte_flow_action_modify_field is not well defined
> for fields larger than 64 bits (for example IPv6 source)
> In addition, the byte order is also not well defined.
>
> Both of those issue should be fixed.
In the current implementation,
the action rte_flow_action_modify_field is not well defined
for fields larger than 64 bits (for example IPv6 source)
In addition, the byte order is also not well defined.
Both of those issue should be fixed.
Signed-off-by: Ori Kam
Acked-by: Matan Azrad
---
V2:
F
5 matches
Mail list logo
