Hi Hemant,
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 05:17:17PM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> On 1/16/2018 8:31 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:41:09AM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> > > W.r.t the multiple discussions in the past about the ability to
> > > dynamically detect the HW mempool s
On 1/16/2018 8:31 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:41:09AM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
W.r.t the multiple discussions in the past about the ability to
dynamically detect the HW mempool support. [1],[2] & [3]
This patchset helps in removing the current static mempool selection
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:41:09AM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> W.r.t the multiple discussions in the past about the ability to
> dynamically detect the HW mempool support. [1],[2] & [3]
>
> This patchset helps in removing the current static mempool selection
> model and provides a flexible mode
W.r.t the multiple discussions in the past about the ability to
dynamically detect the HW mempool support. [1],[2] & [3]
This patchset helps in removing the current static mempool selection
model and provides a flexible model to select the pktmbuf mempool
in more dynamic way.
1) This patchset up
4 matches
Mail list logo
