On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/6/2018 3:44 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > On 4/5/2018 3:42 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote:
> >> NFP PMD PF support requires to access the NFP chip for initialization.
> >> Current NFP PMD PF support was added based on the NSPU interface. This
>
On 4/6/2018 3:44 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/5/2018 3:42 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote:
>> NFP PMD PF support requires to access the NFP chip for initialization.
>> Current NFP PMD PF support was added based on the NSPU interface. This
>> implies to do initialization through the NSP, a embedded ARM
On 4/5/2018 3:42 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote:
> NFP PMD PF support requires to access the NFP chip for initialization.
> Current NFP PMD PF support was added based on the NSPU interface. This
> implies to do initialization through the NSP, a embedded ARM processor
> which does initialization tasks o
NFP PMD PF support requires to access the NFP chip for initialization.
Current NFP PMD PF support was added based on the NSPU interface. This
implies to do initialization through the NSP, a embedded ARM processor
which does initialization tasks on demand. The main problem with this
approach is it r
I did not create the patchset with the -v flag so just the first one has
the v2 tag.
I will remove the patches and send them again.
Apologies.
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Alejandro Lucero <
alejandro.luc...@netronome.com> wrote:
> NFP PMD PF support requires to access the NFP chip for initi
NFP PMD PF support requires to access the NFP chip for initialization.
Current NFP PMD PF support was added based on the NSPU interface. This
implies to do initialization through the NSP, a embedded ARM processor
which does initialization tasks on demand. The main problem with this
approach is it r
6 matches
Mail list logo
