Bad news for the DPDK API below:
03/11/2019 23:09, Thomas Monjalon:
> 03/11/2019 16:27, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> >
> > > > > If we consider what Intel did, i.e. configure VF in place of
> > > > > representor for some operations, there are two drawbacks:
> > > > > - confusing that some ops apply to
On 04.11.2019 21:33, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
Monday, November 4, 2019 12:28 PM, Ilya Maximets:
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] ethdev: configure SR-IOV VF from
host
On 03.11.2019 7:48, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
Friday, November 1, 2019 11:33 AM, Ilya Maximets:
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH
Monday, November 4, 2019 12:28 PM, Ilya Maximets:
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] ethdev: configure SR-IOV VF from
> host
>
> On 03.11.2019 7:48, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
> > Friday, November 1, 2019 11:33 AM, Ilya Maximets:
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v
Hemminger
; Roni Bar Yanai ;
Rony Efraim ; declan.dohe...@intel.com;
bernard.iremon...@intel.com; ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com; Ananyev,
Konstantin
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] ethdev: configure SR-IOV VF from
host
On 03.11.2019 7:48, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
Friday, November 1, 2019 11:33 AM
n Hemminger
> ; Roni Bar Yanai ;
> Rony Efraim ; declan.dohe...@intel.com;
> bernard.iremon...@intel.com; ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com; Ananyev,
> Konstantin
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] ethdev: configure SR-IOV VF from
> host
>
> On 03.11.2019 7:48, Shahaf Shuler wr
On 03.11.2019 7:48, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
Friday, November 1, 2019 11:33 AM, Ilya Maximets:
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] ethdev: configure SR-IOV VF from
host
On 30.10.2019 22:42, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
30/10/2019 17:09, Ilya Maximets:
On 30.10.2019 16:49, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
30
03/11/2019 16:27, Ananyev, Konstantin:
>
> > > > If we consider what Intel did, i.e. configure VF in place of
> > > > representor for some operations, there are two drawbacks:
> > > > - confusing that some ops apply to representor, others apply to VF
> > > > - some ops are not possible on represen
> > > If we consider what Intel did, i.e. configure VF in place of
> > > representor for some operations, there are two drawbacks:
> > > - confusing that some ops apply to representor, others apply to VF
> > > - some ops are not possible on representor (because targetted to VF)
> > >
> > > I stil
Friday, November 1, 2019 11:33 AM, Ilya Maximets:
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] ethdev: configure SR-IOV VF from
> host
>
> On 30.10.2019 22:42, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 30/10/2019 17:09, Ilya Maximets:
> >> On 30.10.2019 16:49, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
&
Friday, November 1, 2019 3:25 PM, Jerin Jacob:
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] ethdev: configure SR-IOV VF from
> host
>
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 6:03 AM Thomas Monjalon
> wrote:
> >
> > 30/10/2019 10:15, Jerin Jacob:
> > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 6:03 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 30/10/2019 10:15, Jerin Jacob:
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 2:26 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >
> > > 30/10/2019 05:08, Jerin Jacob:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:21 AM Thomas Monjalon
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > In a virtual
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 6:03 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 30/10/2019 10:15, Jerin Jacob:
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 2:26 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >
> > > 30/10/2019 05:08, Jerin Jacob:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:21 AM Thomas Monjalon
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > In a virtual
On 01.11.2019 10:06, Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 01.11.2019 1:24, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
30/10/2019 10:24, Jerin Jacob:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:52 PM Shahaf Shuler wrote:
Wednesday, October 30, 2019 6:09 AM, Jerin Jacob:
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] ethdev: configure SR-IOV VF from
On 30.10.2019 22:42, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
30/10/2019 17:09, Ilya Maximets:
On 30.10.2019 16:49, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
30/10/2019 16:07, Ilya Maximets:
On 29.10.2019 19:50, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
In a virtual environment, the network controller may have to configure
some SR-IOV VF parameter
On 01.11.2019 1:24, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
30/10/2019 10:24, Jerin Jacob:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:52 PM Shahaf Shuler wrote:
Wednesday, October 30, 2019 6:09 AM, Jerin Jacob:
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] ethdev: configure SR-IOV VF from
host
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:21 AM
30/10/2019 10:15, Jerin Jacob:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 2:26 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >
> > 30/10/2019 05:08, Jerin Jacob:
> > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:21 AM Thomas Monjalon
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In a virtual environment, the network controller may have to configure
> > > > some S
30/10/2019 10:24, Jerin Jacob:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:52 PM Shahaf Shuler wrote:
> > Wednesday, October 30, 2019 6:09 AM, Jerin Jacob:
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] ethdev: configure SR-IOV VF from
> > > host
> > >
> > > On
30/10/2019 17:09, Ilya Maximets:
> On 30.10.2019 16:49, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 30/10/2019 16:07, Ilya Maximets:
> >> On 29.10.2019 19:50, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>> In a virtual environment, the network controller may have to configure
> >>> some SR-IOV VF parameters for security reasons.
> >
On 30.10.2019 16:49, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
30/10/2019 16:07, Ilya Maximets:
On 29.10.2019 19:50, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
In a virtual environment, the network controller may have to configure
some SR-IOV VF parameters for security reasons.
When the PF (host port) is driven by DPDK (OVS-DPDK ca
30/10/2019 16:07, Ilya Maximets:
> On 29.10.2019 19:50, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > In a virtual environment, the network controller may have to configure
> > some SR-IOV VF parameters for security reasons.
> >
> > When the PF (host port) is driven by DPDK (OVS-DPDK case),
> > we face two different
On 29.10.2019 19:50, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
In a virtual environment, the network controller may have to configure
some SR-IOV VF parameters for security reasons.
When the PF (host port) is driven by DPDK (OVS-DPDK case),
we face two different cases:
- driver is bifurcated (Mellanox case),
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:52 PM Shahaf Shuler wrote:
>
> Wednesday, October 30, 2019 6:09 AM, Jerin Jacob:
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] ethdev: configure SR-IOV VF from
> > host
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:21 AM Thomas Monjalon
> &
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 2:26 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 30/10/2019 05:08, Jerin Jacob:
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:21 AM Thomas Monjalon
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > In a virtual environment, the network controller may have to configure
> > > some SR-IOV VF parameters for security reasons.
> >
>
30/10/2019 05:08, Jerin Jacob:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:21 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >
> > In a virtual environment, the network controller may have to configure
> > some SR-IOV VF parameters for security reasons.
>
> Just to understand, Could you explain more details/examples for
> securit
Wednesday, October 30, 2019 6:09 AM, Jerin Jacob:
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] ethdev: configure SR-IOV VF from
> host
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:21 AM Thomas Monjalon
> wrote:
> >
> > In a virtual environment, the network controller may have to c
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:21 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> In a virtual environment, the network controller may have to configure
> some SR-IOV VF parameters for security reasons.
Just to understand, Could you explain more details/examples for
security reasons?
>
> When the PF (host port) is dr
In a virtual environment, the network controller may have to configure
some SR-IOV VF parameters for security reasons.
When the PF (host port) is driven by DPDK (OVS-DPDK case),
we face two different cases:
- driver is bifurcated (Mellanox case),
so the VF can be configured via the kerne
27 matches
Mail list logo
