Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] add inline protocol support

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 08:43:29PM +0530, Anoob wrote: >Hi Nelio, > >The issue is probably because of a different patch titled, "[PATCH 2/3] >crypto: fix pedentic compilation errors". I was able to reproduce the >issue with that. > >Hope this helps. > >Thanks, >Anoob

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] add inline protocol support

Hi Nelio, The issue is probably because of a different patch titled, "[PATCH 2/3] crypto: fix pedentic compilation errors". I was able to reproduce the issue with that. Hope this helps. Thanks, Anoob On 11/22/2017 06:35 PM, Nelio Laranjeiro wrote: On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 06:25:12PM +0530,

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] add inline protocol support

Hi Nelio, Please ignore the previous mail. I'll check the issue and let you know. Thanks, Anoob On 11/22/2017 07:08 PM, Anoob wrote: Hi Nelio, So you had attempted inline-crypto(not inline-protocol), right? Can you give some more details on the test case which caused the issue? Was it inbo

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] add inline protocol support

Hi Nelio, So you had attempted inline-crypto(not inline-protocol), right? Can you give some more details on the test case which caused the issue? Was it inbound or outbound? And your PMD doesn't have "get_pkt_metadata" function pointer registered, right? Thanks, Anoob On 11/22/2017 06:35

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] add inline protocol support

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 06:25:12PM +0530, Anoob wrote: > Hi Nelio, > > Which mode was attempted when you got the crash? Is it with inline-protocol? Hi Annoob, Yes, MLX5 ConnectX-4 Lx INNOVA is an inline crypto NIC. > Thanks, > > Anoob > > > On 11/22/2017 05:51 PM, Nelio Laranjeiro wrote: > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] add inline protocol support

Hi Nelio, Which mode was attempted when you got the crash? Is it with inline-protocol? Thanks, Anoob On 11/22/2017 05:51 PM, Nelio Laranjeiro wrote: Hi Anoob, I am facing a segfault in ipsec-secgw with this series when using MLX5 PMD, maybe you can help here, see the following gdb backtrace

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] add inline protocol support

Hi Anoob, I am facing a segfault in ipsec-secgw with this series when using MLX5 PMD, maybe you can help here, see the following gdb backtrace. Thread 1 "ipsec-secgw" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x555b5123 in __rte_security_attach_session (sym_op=0x0, sess=0x7ffef7edb5

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] add inline protocol support

The series adds inline protocol support in ipsec-secgw application. First patch introduces changes in lib to enable applications to save a 64 bit metadata in security session. For inline processed packets, application could call "rte_security_get_pkt_metadata" API to retrieve this application regi