On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 09:14:41AM +, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
> When two virtio devices have different flags, it may lead to wrong
> result. Then some unexpected behaviors happen, such as virtio would
> set irq config when it's not supported.
Yes, that's the issue; and that's exactly
Hi David and Yuanhan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2016 7:18 AM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: David Marchand; dev at dpdk.org; Xie, Huawei
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] virtio: fix modify drv_flags for specific device
>
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:05:01AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> Hello Tan,
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Jianfeng Tan
> wrote:
> > Issue: virtio's drv_flags are decided by devices types (modern vs legacy),
> > and which kernel driver is used, and the negotiated features (especially
> >
Hello Tan,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
> Issue: virtio's drv_flags are decided by devices types (modern vs legacy),
> and which kernel driver is used, and the negotiated features (especially
> VIRTIO_NET_STATUS) with backend, which makes it possible to multiple
> virtio d
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 06:08:59PM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
> Issue: virtio's drv_flags are decided by devices types (modern vs legacy),
> and which kernel driver is used, and the negotiated features (especially
> VIRTIO_NET_STATUS) with backend, which makes it possible to multiple
> virtio devic
Issue: virtio's drv_flags are decided by devices types (modern vs legacy),
and which kernel driver is used, and the negotiated features (especially
VIRTIO_NET_STATUS) with backend, which makes it possible to multiple
virtio devices have different versions of drv_flags, but this variable
is currentl
6 matches
Mail list logo
