Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/mlx5: fix vni matching with non-std port at ConnectX-5

2021-08-03 Thread Thomas Monjalon
> > In the recent update, the misc5 matcher was introduced to match VxLAN > > header extra fields. However, ConnectX-5 doesn't support misc5 for the UDP > > ports different from VXLAN's standard one (4789). > > > > Need to fall back to the previous approach and use legacy misc matcher if > > non-s

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/mlx5: fix vni matching with non-std port at ConnectX-5

2021-08-03 Thread Slava Ovsiienko
> -Original Message- > From: Rongwei Liu > Sent: Monday, August 2, 2021 15:21 > To: Matan Azrad ; Slava Ovsiienko > ; Ori Kam ; NBU-Contact- > Thomas Monjalon ; Shahaf Shuler > ; Raslan Darawsheh > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org > Subject: [PATCH v2] net/mlx5: fix vni matching with non

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/mlx5: fix vni matching with non-std port at ConnectX-5

2021-08-03 Thread Slava Ovsiienko
> -Original Message- > From: Rongwei Liu > Sent: Monday, August 2, 2021 15:21 > To: Matan Azrad ; Slava Ovsiienko > ; Ori Kam ; NBU-Contact- > Thomas Monjalon ; Shahaf Shuler > ; Raslan Darawsheh > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org > Subject: [PATCH v2] net/mlx5: fix vni matching with non

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/mlx5: fix vni matching with non-std port at ConnectX-5

2021-08-02 Thread Rongwei Liu
In the recent update, the misc5 matcher was introduced to match VxLAN header extra fields. However, ConnectX-5 doesn't support misc5 for the UDP ports different from VXLAN's standard one (4789). Need to fall back to the previous approach and use legacy misc matcher if non-standard UDP port is reco