Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: fix blocking system events

2020-02-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
aolong ; Zhu, TaoX ; > > Yigit, Ferruh > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ananyev, Konstantin ; > > Lu, Wenzhuo ; sta...@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: fix blocking system events > > > > 17/02/2020 14:01, Ferruh Yigit: > > > On 2/15/2020 3:41

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: fix blocking system events

2020-02-21 Thread Zhu, TaoX
, February 20, 2020 11:37 PM > To: Ye, Xiaolong ; Zhu, TaoX ; > Yigit, Ferruh > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ananyev, Konstantin ; > Lu, Wenzhuo ; sta...@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: fix blocking system events > > 17/02/2020 14:01, Ferruh Yigit: > > On

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: fix blocking system events

2020-02-20 Thread Thomas Monjalon
17/02/2020 14:01, Ferruh Yigit: > On 2/15/2020 3:41 PM, Ye Xiaolong wrote: > > On 01/15, taox@intel.com wrote: > >> From: Zhu Tao > >> > >> IXGBE link status task use rte alarm thread in old implementation. > > > > s/use/uses > > > >> Sometime ixgbe link status task takes up to 9 seconds. Th

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: fix blocking system events

2020-02-17 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 2/15/2020 3:41 PM, Ye Xiaolong wrote: > On 01/15, taox@intel.com wrote: >> From: Zhu Tao >> >> IXGBE link status task use rte alarm thread in old implementation. > > s/use/uses > >> Sometime ixgbe link status task takes up to 9 seconds. This will >> severely affect the rte-alarm-thread-de

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: fix blocking system events

2020-02-15 Thread Ye Xiaolong
On 01/15, taox@intel.com wrote: >From: Zhu Tao > >IXGBE link status task use rte alarm thread in old implementation. s/use/uses >Sometime ixgbe link status task takes up to 9 seconds. This will >severely affect the rte-alarm-thread-dependent a task in the >system, like interrupt or hotplug e

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: fix blocking system events

2020-01-22 Thread Ye Xiaolong
On 01/15, taox@intel.com wrote: >From: Zhu Tao > >IXGBE link status task use rte alarm thread in old implementation. >Sometime ixgbe link status task takes up to 9 seconds. This will >severely affect the rte-alarm-thread-dependent a task in the What does "rte-alarm-thread-dependent a task" me

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: fix blocking system events

2020-01-15 Thread Ananyev, Konstantin
> IXGBE link status task use rte alarm thread in old implementation. > Sometime ixgbe link status task takes up to 9 seconds. This will > severely affect the rte-alarm-thread-dependent a task in the > system, like interrupt or hotplug event. So replace with a > independent thread which has the s

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: fix blocking system events

2020-01-15 Thread taox . zhu
From: Zhu Tao IXGBE link status task use rte alarm thread in old implementation. Sometime ixgbe link status task takes up to 9 seconds. This will severely affect the rte-alarm-thread-dependent a task in the system, like interrupt or hotplug event. So replace with a independent thread which has th