> -Original Message-
> From: David Marchand
> Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 4:32 PM
> To: Zhang, Qi Z
> Cc: Wang, Haiyue ; dev@dpdk.org;
> pvale...@redhat.com; acon...@redhat.com; Rong, Leyi
> ; Tu, Lijuan ;
> ruifeng.w...@arm.com; feifei.wa...@arm.com; sta...@dpdk.org; Guo, Jia
> ;
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 9:07 AM Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Wang, Haiyue
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 10:19 AM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: pvale...@redhat.com; acon...@redhat.com;
> > david.march...@redhat.com; Zhang, Qi Z ; Rong, Leyi
> > ; Tu, Lijuan ;
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wang, Haiyue
> Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 10:19 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: pvale...@redhat.com; acon...@redhat.com;
> david.march...@redhat.com; Zhang, Qi Z ; Rong, Leyi
> ; Tu, Lijuan ;
> ruifeng.w...@arm.com; feifei.wa...@arm.com; Wang, Haiyue
> ;
There is an 82599 errata that UDP frames with a zero checksum are
incorrectly marked as checksum invalid by the hardware. This was
leading to misleading PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD flag.
This patch changes the bad UDP checksum to PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN,
so the software application will then have to reco
4 matches
Mail list logo