Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix IPv4 fragment offload issue

2021-03-05 Thread Zhang, Qi Z
> -Original Message- > From: dev On Behalf Of Xing, Beilei > Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 3:17 PM > To: Li, Xiaoyun ; Guo, Jia ; Lu, > Wenzhuo > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix IPv4 fragment offload issue >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix IPv4 fragment offload issue

2021-03-01 Thread Xing, Beilei
> -Original Message- > From: Li, Xiaoyun > Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 3:03 PM > To: Xing, Beilei ; Guo, Jia ; Lu, > Wenzhuo > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Li, Xiaoyun ; sta...@dpdk.org > Subject: [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix IPv4 fragment offload issue > > IPv4 fragment_offset mask was required to

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix IPv4 fragment offload issue

2021-03-01 Thread Xiaoyun Li
IPv4 fragment_offset mask was required to be 0 no matter what the spec value was. But zero mask means not caring about fragment_offset field then both non-frag and frag packets should hit the rule. But the actual fragment rules should be like the following: Only non-fragment packets can hit Rule 1