On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Christian Ehrhardt
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Thomas Monjalon
> wrote:
>>
>> Not sure about how it can be used in distributions, but it does not hurt
>> to provide the config option.
>> Are you going to link applications against a fixed DPDK versi
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Thomas Monjalon
wrote:
> Not sure about how it can be used in distributions, but it does not hurt
> to provide the config option.
> Are you going to link applications against a fixed DPDK version for
> every libraries?
>
Kind of yes - we can still update "inside"
2017-03-01 15:35, Jan Blunck:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Christian Ehrhardt
> wrote:
> > Downstreams might want to provide different DPDK releases at the same
> > time to support multiple consumers of DPDK linked against older and newer
> > sonames.
> >
> > Also due to the interdependencie
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Christian Ehrhardt
wrote:
> Downstreams might want to provide different DPDK releases at the same
> time to support multiple consumers of DPDK linked against older and newer
> sonames.
>
> Also due to the interdependencies that DPDK libraries can have applications
Downstreams might want to provide different DPDK releases at the same
time to support multiple consumers of DPDK linked against older and newer
sonames.
Also due to the interdependencies that DPDK libraries can have applications
might end up with an executable space in which multiple versions of a
5 matches
Mail list logo