Hi, helin:
> > +#define MBUF_INVALID_PORT 0x
> Replaced with below, or use UINT16_MAX directly?
> #define MBUF_INVALID_PORT UINT16_MAX
I prefer #define MBUF_INVALID_PORT UINT16_MAX
Thanks
Zhiyong
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 3:28 PM
> To: Yang, Zhiyong
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh ;
> step...@networkplumber.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] librte_mbuf: modify port initialization value
>
> 05/09/2017
05/09/2017 07:13, Zhiyong Yang:
> In order to support more than 256 virtual ports, the field "port"
> in rte_mbuf has been increased to 16 bits. The initialization/reset
> value of the field "port" should be changed from 0xff to 0x
> accordingly.
This patch should be merged with the range incr
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhiyong Yang
> Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 1:13 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: tho...@monjalon.net; Yigit, Ferruh; step...@networkplumber.org; Yang,
> Zhiyong
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2
In order to support more than 256 virtual ports, the field "port"
in rte_mbuf has been increased to 16 bits. The initialization/reset
value of the field "port" should be changed from 0xff to 0x
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Yang
---
Changes in V2:
Introduce MBUF_INVALID_PORT as a const
5 matches
Mail list logo
